The Politics behind "Slumdog Millionaire"

All of you that have seen Slumdog Millionaire would have to agree that it deserves all the glory it has been showered with by most critics. Jam-packed with zest and clever plot twists, this movie definitely stands as this year’s best picture. Of course, the young actors (Dev Patel, Freida Pinto) scorching up the sliver screen as they give tour de force performances, are among the many reasons why that is the case. But I am not going to continue raving about the magnificence this film---I simply intend on discussing it as a political commentary on globalization. But first, a little synopsis for those that have yet to see the movie.

After losing his mother to a disastrous tribal conflict, the film’s protagonist Jamal Malik (played by Dev Patel) is immediately exposed to the evils slithering within Mumbai (the poverty, corruption, violence etc.). He’s only about 7 when this tragedy strikes his life. This means that he is still surrounded by the shadows of innocence and vulnerability. Sadly, those shadows blindly lead him into the hands of an inner-city prick hunting orphaned children so as to place them as street beggars for profit. He even goes as far as blinding some of those kids hoping to generate more money from the public

Sickening? Obviously. But wait a minute… Let’s focus on the root of all this evil here; the one thing that causes most humans to dive in the black hole of sin,


A scene from Fox Searchlight's "Slumdog Millionaire."

Desperation…

Yes, desperation. He was obviously sick and tired of inhaling the dusts of poverty spreading all over India so he resorted to child exploitation. Clearly, director Danny Boyle was reflecting the harsh realities of India with this storyline because there was no mention of a law suit against him for tarnishing the country’s image (or the famous “over-exaggeration and sensationalization” the media is accused of). Nevertheless, this desperation has been causing many people in third-world countries like India to do things that go against their moral compasses----all in the name of “survival.” It is even more unfortunate that all of them will always be imprisoned by their misery as long as Globalization continues nurturing poverty all over the world.

Many of you must have already heard of the various economic implications involved with globalization; mainly the death of nationalized companies around the world as American corporations “globalize.” But I am more concerned about the social effects; like this child exploitation presented by Danny Boyle in his film. It breaks me that globalization has actually created a vicious cycle. You see, these impoverished kids (like Jamal) are supposed to be the “future leaders’ of their countries---but once they find themselves stuck in a whirlpool of poverty and corruption, they won’t be able to lead their countries towards some kind of success. This obviously allows Corporate America to maintain its reign over these fractured countries, causing more economic pollution to spur.

I am hoping that maybe Mr. Barrack and his gospel for “Change” will try to end this vicious cycle. However, I am not putting too much expectations on him because obviously it is hard to tame American Corporations. But whatever the case, something needs to be done…and fast. I mean, its about (f****) time for the infamous G8 to actually put forth a realistic implementation of the policies they discuss every now and then. I am so sick of watching the “other half” of this world dying a slow, painful death.



P.S-Slumdog Millionaire is still being run by most theatres----go watch it!

24 comments:

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:36 PM

Well said, Nigel! I will comment after my first lecture--11:30-ish...u cool?

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 2:39 PM

lmao,,,was that you trying to show off that school is back?

CONGRATS----

ya, thats cool..

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM

I have not even seen it! I can't even read the note in fear that it'll destroy the movie for me.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM

NOOOOOOO, HOW COULD YOU EVEN THINK THAT ABOUT ME???!? And FYI, I have early classes on Tues. & Thurs. soooooo TECHNICALLY SPEAKING, I was NOT SHOWING OFF!!! (Although, this may do the trick...)

To begin with, I actually haven't watched Slumdog Millionaire soooo my criticisms would be made entirely in the dark (no pun intended). BUT, I do have something to say about this movie because it does cover a wide range of issues and it definitely deserves critical scrutiny:

One of the basis (bases ?) of such arguments is the “success” of the film that is defined by the Golden Globes (and various other awards) that this film has won. Awards can definitely be taken as a parameter of “success” and 31 awards (apart from 4 Golden Globes) is an IMPRESSIVE score to begin with. I DO see a point in this argument because of its western origins. Soooo my question becomes: Do you think Slumdog Millionaire would have gotten the same attention had it been made/directed by an Indian director???

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM

I think it’s the BIGGEST handicap we as “westerners” possess.

Slumdog Millionaire is definitely at the top of my list to watch after this HELL-HOLE I’m in now comes to an end….

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM

P.S. Why are you posting at 5:36 AM???

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Slumdog WOULD NEVER have gotten this much attention if it was done by an Indian Director, no way.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Globalization is this reason why India has a growing middle class. The middle class are the "great stabilizers"; a bigger middle class means less desperation. China and India are becoming huge economic forces in the world and they have globalization to thank; they're becoming more and more like Western countries.

Mind you, I don't mean to paint a completley rosey picture. Globalization isn't all good. Naturally, there are winners and losers; some people benefit more from it than others in different spheres. But hey, nothing's ever black and white.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM

I thought the main character's call centre job was pretty telling too. A lot of jobs are being outsourced to India.

Apparently, there's a huge demand for journalists.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/08/07/journalists_go_to_india/

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM

Sorry if I sound like a smart-ass. I'm aware of it.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 2:44 PM

I did not check it out bt ill search 4 it. One thing i know is politicians benefit more any other person.

Let me refer to Africa, most of the presidents' children are studying abroad enjoying luxury life. In Pakistan, when the late father of Benazier Bhutto was prime minister, she was sent to the best universities in the world (Harvard and Oxford). In Africa, the doughter of Zim is apparently studying in China. What does that tell u?

Marian Abs-eskharon SHOWING OFF his classes..lol!

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Alex B-

Do you really think the benefits out-weigh the negative effects in India?

I am sure that you aware of its massive population-----and out of that mass, only a "bleep" makes part of this "growing middle class" you speak of. It's funny because the impoverished parts of India are growing since the population is increasing exponentially. I hardly think there will be a time where this "middle class" you speak of is a dominant group; proving globalization to be the key to India's success..

What I am merely trying to get at is, globalization creates more poverty, because countries lose absolute control of their economic assets---this drives innocent people to do crazy things in order to survive. I mean, why do you think prostitution is still a booming business in India?

You did say nothing is "black and white."
Well frankly, globalization is spurring more black, than white

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM

And btw, what is also happening is once these most of the indivicuals in the middle class flee to North America after earning enough money.

That explains why Toronto is flooded with a lot of immigrants---they were part of the middle class in their countries, but then fled it; hoping to strike gold up North. I can actually use my parents and other relatives of mine as an example, because they fled Zimbabwe, even though they had secured jobs because of globalization.

So, obviously, these middle class individuals won't be available in their countries to become "great stabilizers" after all.

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM

And btw, what is also happening is that most of the individuals in the middle class*

correction....

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM

As for Marian and Roo

Perhaps it wouldn't have got this much attention with an Indian director. But let's applaud Boyle for not being biased with his film.

The fact that he showed what is really going on, helps to dispel people who still walk around applauding globalization and its "successes" in India and China (Alex B lol).

don't you think?...

And btw, the fact that millions gathered around for the "Who wants to be a Millionaire", comes off as a satirical to me. I think Danny Boyle intended to show how Pop Culture is imprisoning the minds of people around the world. But then that's just my opinion.

Moreover, they all obviously gathered around for this, because it is a "rarity" in India(and other third-world countries) for anyone to have that kind of money...But its not the case here, right? so many people walking with millions in their pockets here.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM

there is a "who wants to be a millionaire" in India
its called
"Kaun Banega Crore Pati" very popular show...

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM

yes, but its a show that stemmed from the globalization of American T.V, no?

coz, you can't tell me its an original idea, from India

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 5:38 PM

I know it stemmed, I was just pointing out the fact thats its not called "who wants to be a millionaire" in india

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM

o lol

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM

umm ya.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 5:40 PM

i wouldnt be so quick to say that is all because of globalization. i think there are other factors that come into play.
like the cast systerm.

i dont think obama or anyone outside can really do serious change in india. call me a pessimist but india is filled with corruption. the change has to come within. lol, thats sounds so cheesy but i think its true.

i applaud the movie because now the world can see a more realistic picture of india. i agree with Roohi, puh-lease, we prolly wouldnt even be talking about this issue if it was directed by a brown person.

i think u should read The Song of Kahunsha (i forget the author). it focuses on similar issues as this movie.

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 5:45 PM

hmmm, true, but globalization still goes up there, as one of the major perpetrators...

If you don't mind, tell more about this cast system, you speak of

  Nigel Maruva Chikukwa

February 3, 2009 at 5:50 PM

btw, what can Obama can do, is "try" a BIG "try" to pull Corporate America's plug.

This allows third-world countries to have more room to mend themselves.

  Anonymous

February 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM

Yeah Salome, your right, India =Corruption beyond belief. It's actually ridiculous the amount of corruption there is within the government,change does have to come from within.

 

This Template is Brought to you by : Zenplate.blogspot.com blogger templates